The origins of this
building can be found in an announcement by the Gulf Colorado and Santa
Fe on January 31, 1911. A copy of an article from the Dallas
Morning News is shown below. An August 26, 1911 edition of the
Eagle Lake Headlight states that the Santa Fe expected to handle trains
at the new depot on September 1. An article in the September 2, 1911 issue mentions a social event
- an American Women's Club supper - being held inside the building. The Wells Fargo & Co. Express agency
was transferred to the Santa Fe depot in October of 1911. C. S.
Durham is listed as the station agent.
Prior to the construction of this
building, the Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway may have used the
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio (Southern Pacific) depot in
Eagle Lake as a joint station. The station number assigned by the
Santa Fe for Eagle Lake was 8918. W. H. Rather is shown as
the agent in the Official List of Santa Fe Stations from 1906 -
1911, but a GC&SF
payroll report for the year 1908 lists only
a maintenance foreman in Eagle Lake proper. This may be because Rather
was a Southern Pacific employee and was paid by his company, and
a contract between the SP and the GC&SF took care of any
payment between the two companies for the service provided by
Southern Pacific.
Additionally, the San Antonio & Aransas
Pass Railway had a depot in downtown Eagle Lake, just north of the
present day Dairy Queen. Along
about 1909, a small series of articles in the Eagle Lake Headlight
(local newspaper) mention the increasing desire for a new "union station" for passenger
service in Eagle Lake. Citizens thought they deserved better
facilities than the railroads were providing at the time. It is
unclear from the newspaper articles exactly who proposed the site for
this new depot, but the building would have been located where Gulf Colorado &
Santa Fe crossed the Galveston Harrisburg & San Antonio
(milepost 112.0 on the GC&SF) -
about 1/2 mile east of downtown.
An article in
the August 27, 1910 edition of the Headlight states: "There has been much talk
in Eagle Lake concerning the building of a union depot here by the three
railroads, but the Headlight does not believe that a union depot will be
erected here at any near date. The Headlight bases its belief upon
the fact that the San Antonio & Aransas Pass is contemplating a change
in its line coming into town from the east. This road is
considering making a change in the course of its line so as to cross the
Sunset [GH&SA] at a point close to where the Santa Fe crosses the
same road, the crossing of the three roads to be operated jointly by an
interlocking system. Until this is done, it is reasonably assured
that there will be no union depot in Eagle Lake, and even then should
one be built, it will undoubtedly be erected where the Santa Fe now
crosses the Sunset, near the old Beakes place, and being so far out of
town, a depot here would be very inconvenient to the citizens of Eagle
Lake." [See
the bottom image on the MAPS page to see
the possible location of the proposed "union depot".]
The article continues: "The Headlight for one would prefer to
see the Santa Fe erect its own depot on its lot near Mr. Stoermer's
grist mill and the other two roads maintain their present depots as they
are now than to have a union station so far out of town."
After this, the "union depot" subject seems to have disappeared (at
least from the Headlight), but a July 30, 1910 article mentions a new
Santa Fe depot to be constructed "near Townley's Machine Shop". An
article in the Dec. 24, 1910 edition of the Headlight states: "The
foundation work on the long talked of Santa Fe depot was begun last week
and this road has also commenced work on a large cotton platform. We
understand that a telegram was received this week ordering the depot
material removed to Duke, Texas. As this paper understands it, in order
for this division to hold the apportionment made for the erection of the
depot here, work to the amount of at least $50 had to be made before
January first or, according to railroad rules, this apportionment would
be revoked and another could not be gotten before next June..."
The article goes on to state that the Headlight had been censured many
times the previous week for not having reported on the depot under
construction, but the Headlight opined that the depot would not be
completed any time soon.
Nothing else is
written in the Headlight regarding the Santa Fe depot until the
August 28, 1911 article. The nice modern brick depot certainly put the
Santa Fe in a good position by providing the local citizens with
facilities more to their liking.